Modular vs. Traditional Data Centers
There are many advantages to modular data centers. Before we can talk about those advantages, we should first understand what data centers are and how modular designs differ from traditional models. Traditional data centers are large facilities that are custom-built on-site. As a result, they tend to be expensive, time-consuming to build, and inflexible once completed. Modular data centers are built in a controlled environment offsite from where they will be deployed. Because of this, these data centers are faster to build, easier to set up, and more affordable when compared to traditional centers. These capabilities not only increase operational flexibility but also reduce environmental impact compared to traditional data centers.
Why Cooling Matters in Data Centers
One thing that doesn’t differ between these two types of data centers is the amount of heat that is generated. Both data centers consume large amounts of electricity and in turn are generating immense amounts of heat. A modular data center can generate from 5kW to 80kW of heat per rack with entire facilities generating megawatts of heat overall. Put simply, data centers can be viewed as giant electric heaters that just so happen to process information. The primary difference between these models lies in how they manage and dissipate heat. Modular data centers rely on traditional air cooling (think fans and vents) advancing into liquid cooling that involves heat transfer fluids and server immersion. Traditional data centers rely on air cooling with hot and cold aisle containment, which are well suited for larger, fixed facilities.
Heat Transfer Fluids: The Future of Modular Cooling
But what is the ideal form of cooling strategy for modular data centers? As modular data centers are growing in popularity, the cooling methods are becoming more advanced, and more efficient. Heat transfer fluids aren’t a new solution for thermal management, but data center energy engineers are now finding innovative ways to put them to work. The benefits of using heat transfer fluids (HTF) to manage modular data centers are astounding:
- Allows for higher server density
- Noise reduction
- Reduces the need for massive HVAC systems that risk taking away space from servers.
A Case for COREFROST™
Heat transfer fluid (HTF) are recognized as the most effective and efficient approach to thermal management in modular data centers. Because of this, choosing the right fluid becomes essential. As AI usage continues to rise, it’s important to have a fluid that can keep up with the demand and can maintain low viscosity at even the most extreme temperatures. COREFROST™ Low Viscosity Heat Transfer Fluid is engineered to meet these exact demands, delivering superior heat transfer performance in the harshest conditions. In addition, as environmental responsibility becomes increasingly important, COREFROST™ offers a clear advantage:
- Renewable
- Biodegradable
- Designed to be safer for the environment.
As modular data centers continue to evolve, the importance of efficient, high performance cooling solutions cannot be overstated. Selecting the right fluid ensures long-term performance, operational reliability, and environmental responsibility. COREFROST™ was purpose built to meet these demands, offering exceptional thermal performance in extreme conditions while supporting a more sustainable future.
FAQs About Modular Data Centers and Cooling
- What are data centers used for?
- Data centers serve as the backbone of the digital world, housing vast amounts of information, powering websites and cloud services, and running complex AI processing. They are often considered the physical infrastructure behind the internet.
- Why is cooling crucial for data centers?
- Effective cooling is essential for data centers. Without it, servers would overheat, leading to data loss, hardware damage, and complete system shutdowns, causing severe online disruptions and significant financial losses.
- Can HTF reduce downtime in data centers?
- Certain Heat Transfer Fluids (HTFs) contain less water than traditional coolants, this minimizes the risk of corrosion, mineral buildup, reduces maintenance costs, altogether improving uptime.
For a deeper comparison of heat transfer fluid performance, environmental safety, and viscosity at extreme temperatures, see our detailed analysis of COREFROST versus Ethylene Glycol.
